
A 13-item form with
specific questions to consider when reading an article. Includes questions
regarding the article source, introduction, methodology, results, and
discussion.
|
A table to enter specific
information extracted from each article utilized in the literature review.
This table provides space to describe article description, methodological
characteristics, results and conclusions, notes from critique, and strategy
type.
|
This tool includes three
sections, the literature inventory, the classification of evidence, and the
state-level implementation score. One summary is completed for each strategy.
|
This tool describes the
five levels used to rate the evidence. It gives examples of how the rating is
established, what to consider for each rating, and data source examples.
|
This tool is
used to determine which criteria the steering committee will use for the
prioritization process. It provides 11 frequently discussed criterion
and allows for other suggestions.
|
This tool
collects input from the steering committee on which roles would be
appropriate for the agency regarding each strategy. The page is to be
completed for each strategy and may lead to the elimination of strategies
that do not align well with the agency.
|
The findings
from a survey administered to steering committee members soliciting their
input on criteria to prioritize among the strategies and define the state
health agencies role.
|
This table
describes the final five criteria selected by CDPHE’s obesity steering
committee to prioritize among the 58 rated strategies.
|
This ranked
list of the 58 strategies resulted from the meetings and decisions of the
steering committee and was presented to the executive committee for action
and final resolution.
|
Contact information is included at the bottom of each tool if you have questions or comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment